Search for: "Art-Optic, LTD." Results 1 - 20 of 51
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2014, 1:33 pm
Kevin Castel dismissed plaintiff Newlight Eyewear, LLC’s action seeking a declaration that it does not infringe defendant Art-Optic, Ltd. [read post]
Tobrix commercializes two types of optical fiber for treatment of varicose veins that allegedly infringe the patent. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 1:15 am
When a prior art document is a potential "springboard", it is irrelevant that there are other prior art documents that may be equally suitable as starting points for the development that leads to the invention. [read post]
20 May 2015, 7:18 am
The Court was requested to interpret and to apply Article 8(5) of Regulation 40/1994 (as superseded by Regulation 207/2009).The indisputably well known Swiss watch manufacturer Swatch SA failed before OHIM to protect its rights in the word SWATCH and for figurative Community trade marks (CTMs) and international registration for the sign SWATCH, all registered for, inter alia, goods in class 14 “precious metals and their alloys and goods in precious metals or coated therewith (excluding… [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 5:31 pm by INFORRM
On the same day there was an application in the case of Optical Express Ltd & ors v Associated Newspapers Ltd before Warby J. [read post]
5 May 2010, 10:14 pm
Emcore sued Optium for infringing laser-based optical fiber communication patents 6,282,003 and 6,490,071. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 1:13 pm
Ultraseal Ltd., 781 F.2d 861, 866 (Fed. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 3:28 pm
Throughout the patent, the term "imaging" is used in connection with an optical feedback process in which either a computer or a user can set up and manipulate an inscription. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 12:55 pm by Falk Metzler
  Point of sale (inventive): In T 0346/08 of 25 October 2010 Appeal Board 3.4.03 under Chairman G Eliasson addressed the rejection of 05 075 146 of January Patents Ltd. due to lack of inventive step. [read post]